Home  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Sitemap
SHOPPING CART    FORUMS    CHAT   
ARCHIVED ISSUE
October Issue 1
Tell me what to do! What is the difference between teaching decision making and giving advice? A Doula asks What do you do when your family is not taking your work seriously? Great web design Tips for spicing up your website and making it your best sales tool Culture Vulture Learn about other cultures and how they approach pregnancy, birth and parenting The Bottom Line What's new in research and news?
 
INFORMATION Current issue Archives Subscribe to Belly Up Unsubscribe from Belly Up Change your email address RSS Feed Contact us Go to the CBI website 
 
Childbirth International provides training programs for doulas & antenatal teachers. The leading provider of home based learning across the world, Childbirth International provides you with this free newsletter to keep you up to date and help you develop your skills and knowledge.

BELLY UP - The Bottom Line

Danish researchers have announced that exercise during pregnancy triples the risk of miscarriage. But does it really? Our analysis of the research helps you to help your clients.

Exercise leads to pregnancy loss?

Researchers in Denmark carried out a study between 1996 and 2002, with the results being published in September 2007. Using a questionnaire, they interviewed more than 92,000 women about their exercise patterns during pregnancy. The women's responses were documented through computer assisted telephone interviews.

 

The authors of the study concluded that there appears to be an association between exercise in early pregnancy and the risk of subsequent miscarriage. They do highlight that the results should be treated with caution as the method they used to obtain the information could have led to bias which then affected the study results.

 

The telephone interviews were carried out using computer assisted technology. The women were asked "Now that you are pregnant do you engage in any kind of exercise?". If they answered yes to this question, they were then asked:

 

"What kind of exercise do you engage in?"
"How many times a week do you engage in [this exercise]?"
"How many minutes a time do you engage in [this exercise]?"
"Do you engage in other kinds of exercise?"

 

If they answered yes to the final question, they then looped through the series of questions again to allow them to answer for all types of exercise they did. The researchers categorised the answers into six categories: high impact exercise (jogging, ball games, and racket sports), low impact exercise (aerobic
for pregnant women, aerobic, dance, and walking/hiking), workout or fitness training, bike riding or horseback riding, swimming, and other. When asking questions about other factors for analysis of the results they included:

  • mother's age

  • previous miscarriages

  • education level & employment status

  • coffee consumption during pregnancy

  • smoking during pregnancy

  • amount of physical exertion at work

  • history of an eating disorder

  • body mass index before pregnancy

  • history of fertility treatment

  • history of chronic disease

  • number of pregnancies and previous live births

Miscarriage was defined as the death of an infant before 22 weeks gestation (not including terminations). They compared the miscarriage rates of women who exercised with those who did not. The findings indicate that the risk of miscarriage triples in women who exercise strenuously when compared with those who do not exercise.

 

There are several issues worth considering before assuming that exercise increases the risk of miscarriage.

 

Previous history of exercise not taken into account

The researchers do not appear to have asked the women whether they had exercised prior to their pregnancy. We are unable to determine whether strenuous exercise in itself is a risk factor for miscarriage or whether it is only a risk factor if the woman has exerted herself more in pregnancy than she normally would.

 

Bias due to self disclosure about smoking and coffee drinking

The women were all asked to report whether they smoked or drank coffee during pregnancy. Although the women were not being interviewed face to face, the social judgments made towards women who smoke during pregnancy could have led women who did smoke to not disclose this information. The same is true, although possibly to a lesser degree, with coffee consumption since it is now well known amongst pregnant women that drinking excess coffee can impact the health of a developing baby and may increase the miscarriage rate.

 

Assumptions about exercise and health leading to bias

It is not clear what the women were told the study was examining. If they were told the study was looking at the links between exercise and miscarriage, there is a possibility that they assumed it was looking at whether exercise DECREASED the risk of miscarriage. If this is the case, women may have overstated how much exercise they did during pregnancy. We would assume that women are more likely to say they did more exercise than they really did, rather than say they were sedentary, since generally exercise is considered a beneficial activity.

 

Miscarriage itself may affect recall about exercise patterns

Nearly 77% of the women who miscarried were interviewed after the miscarriage had taken place. The miscarriage itself may have affected how the women recalled the amount of exercise they did during pregnancy. Bearing in mind that grief affects our recall of events, and guilt is often a factor in miscarriage, it is possible that the women overstated the amount of exercise they did.

 

Healthy pregnancies may lead to more women stopping exercise

The authors point out another source of bias. It is well documented that women with healthy pregnancies are more likely to experience nausea in the first trimester, when compared with women who will subsequently miscarry. If women experience nausea, they may be more likely to stop strenuous exercise in early pregnancy because they feel ill. This would mean that rather than the exercise being a cause of the miscarriage, it was possible because the woman was going to miscarry anyway.

 

Number of minutes of exercise is different from intensity of exercise

The authors asked women in the interviews how many minutes of exercise they did. However, they did not ask the women what levels of intensity they used when exercising. Two women doing an aerobic workout may do it at very different levels. Walking and hiking were included in low impact exercise for example, but there is a significant difference between walking to pick the kids up from school and hiking in the forest. Without knowledge of intensity of exercise it is difficult to draw any conclusions simply from the number of minutes that a woman exercised.

 

Miscarriage rates are inconsistent with "typical" miscarriage rates

In the study only 3.4% of the women miscarried. This is significantly lower than the number of pregnancies typically expected to miscarry which is usually quoted as between 15-20%. It is not clear as to why the miscarriage rate was so low in this study population but this could have been a confounding factor that impacted the results.

 

The authors acknowledge the many areas of potential bias in the study and state themselves that it is not possible to draw any conclusions or make any recommendations based on their findings.  Interestingly though, many of the news reports that followed the publishing of this paper used headlines that appeared to draw conclusions.

 

Inquirer: Exercise during pregnancy can lead to miscarriage

The Australian: Heavy exercise can up miscarriage risk

News (news.com.au): Exercise can cause miscarriage

The Guardian: Exercise can increase risk of miscarriage

 

It is worth thinking about how these headlines affect women and how they behave during their pregnancy as a result of reading them. The newspaper articles do not evaluate the research or look at some of the questionable areas. It is unlikely that the reporters have even looked at the research itself. In most cases, they receive a brief article from a news agency such as Reuters, which is then replicated across the world in each news publication.

 

Many news articles concluded with: But the findings do argue in favor of a review of exercise guidelines for pregnant women, the authors suggest.

 

What the researchers actually said in their conclusion was: In spite of the findings of this study, we do, however, think that it is too early to draw any public health inferences on this basis. Many positive effects of exercise are well established, and the findings of this study need to be replicated.

 

You can read the full text of the research here:

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1471
-0528.2007.01496.x

 

Childbirth International's take on research

We often see comments on the latest research reported on news websites, magazines and the various lists and discussion forums related to childbirth. What is challenging for a birth professional is determining how good the research was and whether it is adding anything to the literature about evidence-based care in pregnancy, birth and parenting.

It appears that journalists may report on the latest research using the abstract or the press release as the sole source of information. The problem with this is that the abstract is not always showing all the information that was gleaned from a study, or may be skewed towards what the authors were hoping to find.

News is often taken from organisations like Reuters. Again, this is a brief overview of the research, intended to highlight the most relevant points. Critical information about risks and complications may be left out.

Generally these news briefings do not provide any information on the number of people in a study and the methods used when the study was carried out. Nor do they usually mention any potential bias from the authors of the study, for example when a study author has financial interests that may be affected by the study results.

Childbirth International aims to highlight the issues related to some of the latest research and examine some of the relevant issues, enabling you to help your clients find their way through the maze of options available to them and understand evidence-based care.

For more information on training with Childbirth International, take a look at our website, or contact us.

Childbirth International offers training programs for Birth Doulas, Postnatal Doulas and Antenatal Teachers. From September 2008 we will also be launching a Breastfeeding Counselling course.

 

Information

Archives  
Read past issues of the Childbirth International newsletters
Go to archives
 

 RSS Feed
Add an RSS feed so you can always see when the latest news is updated
Add RSS feed

Subscribe
Want to get the newsletter automatically emailed to you?
Subscribe now (free)
 

Unsubscribe
Want to be removed from our mailing list?
Unsubscribe now


  Click for US spelling
 

CBI NEWS
  Read the latest announcements from CBI  
     
Student Log In
Username
 
Password
  Forgot password? Register now!
Contact Us
  USA (415) 691-6162
  UK (020) 8144-4002
  Australia (02) 8011-4177
  Or Send us an enquiry
© 2008 Childbirth International. All rights reserved. Reg No 53053667J.  Privacy Policy   |   Refund Policy